Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Public Spaces are Private Spaces too


Many times we may think that voicing our opinion wherever possible is something that is acceptable.  We are able to protest and march wherever we want because the space is public and open for everyone.  That makes us feels a sense of freedom that we want to take advantage of, but are public spaces really public? Or should they be public?  No, they should not.  The number one important factor is safety and many times these events turn violent therefore the government should decide what can be done in what space.
Public spaces such as streets, parks, squares and plazas should be used for what they are intended for.  Streets should be used as a form of transportation for cars, bicycle riders, pedestrians, etc.  People should not be allowed to protest in areas like these because it can be very disruptive.  For example, if there was a protest on the street I use to go to work I would have to find an alternate route that would result in me being late for work which, depending on the job, can lead to getting fired.  Parks are a place for people to relax, enjoy the weather, and have a good time.  I do not think that it is respectful and appropriate to protest in a place like these because you are ruining someone’s day.  People go to parks to enjoy their day and if they are suddenly surprised by a loud commotion, it can really upset them.  If there are parents with their kids it can be even more frustrating because protests can turn violent which means the parent has to be worried and alert all the time or remove themselves from the situation which can be disappointing because the day out with their kids is ruined.  As for squares and plazas the owner of those places should be able to decide what is done there and what is not.  Although it may be a “public space”, at the end of the day there is always someone who is the “”official” owner, the person who stays in charge of the place.
            Protests should not be allowed in public spaces because they can turn violent and jeopardize the security of others.  Walljasper gave us an example in “From Middle East to Madison, Justice Depends on Public Spaces” where he mentions, “…people express their aspirations and face bloody reprisals…”  This is a clear example of how dangerous a protest can turn.  The people can be so pumped up and determined to get there mission across that when officials arrive to observe them, they often see it as a threat and as if they will be stopped.  This is when they start attacking the armed forces and a fight breaks out, turning a calm protest into a battlefield.  This is when things get dangerous.  You never know what people around may be carrying so someone with a gun can pull it out and start shooting causing a riot that can have deadly and unfortunate results.  People that are also walking by minding their own business can be suddenly pulled into this battlefield and all of a sudden be part of it, just because the person looked like a normal citizen that could be part of a protest.  That is not fair because you are put in a dangerous predicament without anyone telling you and all you were doing was trying to get from point A to point B.
            The government should be able to decide what to do with these spaces because it is necessary for someone to put order.  As Berg briefly states in “The Occupy Movement and the New Public Space”, “But the public spaces we’re looking at should be more appropriately defined as publicly accessible places subject to the rules of its owner, the government…”  It is extremely crucial for rules to be set in these places or else people will take advantage of their freedom and do whatever they want, literally.  If everyone does whatever their heart desires, these places can turn chaotic. People will be people, which means they may do things that others do not view as appropriate.  The government only wants the best for their people which includes keeping them safe and content.  Clearly, these rules would not be anything too crazy and out of hand but just something that can work to keep order.  If order is kept than everyone will be happy because they do not have to feel threatened any where they go.
            In the end, we have to keep in mind that out safety comes first.  If any of our actions at any time put others in danger, then something is being done wrong.  Placing rules in places where order can be essential is important because everyone wants to feel a sense of safety wherever it is that they go.
           








Work Cited
Berg, Nate. “The Occupy Movement and the New Public Space”. The Atlantic Cities. November 22, 2011. Web
Walljasper, Jay. “From Middle East to Madison, Justice Depends on Public Spaces”. Reading Culture: Contexts for Critical Reading and Writing. Eds. Diana George and John Trimbur. Boston: Pearson, 2012.